Volume 5, Issue 1 (2-2023)                   IJMCL 2023, 5(1): 1-9 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Asadi M, Shamsipour Dehkordi P, Entezari M. (2023). Effects of Linear and Non-linear Pedagogy on Motor and Cognitive Creativity. IJMCL. 5(1), 1-9. doi:10.52547/ijmcl.5.1.1
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-121-en.html
Associate Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran Iran , p.shamsipour@alzahra.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1881 Views)
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of linear and non-linear pedagogy on motor and cognitive creativity with respect to the role of high and low memory inhibition.
Methods: 40 students (Mean 7 ± 0.51 years) were divided into four groups (high inhibition and nonlinear training, low inhibition and nonlinear training, high inhibition and linear training, and low inhibition and linear training). The training sessions included 6 weeks, 3 sessions per week, and 60 minutes for each session. In the pretest, Torrance's cognitive thinking test and Bertsch's motor creativity test were performed on them and fundamental movements were performed in both linear and nonlinear methods.

Results: The results of the 2 (type of training) × 2 (memory inhibition) analysis of covariance showed that in all components (fluency, originality, and flexibility) of motor creativity and cognitive thinking, the nonlinear training group performed better than linear training (p≤0.05). In fluency and originality of cognitive thinking, high memory inhibition groups were better than low memory inhibition groups (p≤0.05). In the fluency of cognitive thinking, the nonlinear group had the highest score and the linear group had the lowest score.
Conclusion: The results showed that the use of nonlinear training is more effective than linear training in improving motor creativity and cognitive thinking.

 
Full-Text [PDF 518 kb]   (905 Downloads)    
  • Creativity includes measures of fluency, flexibility, and originality and is important for learning motor skills.
  • Non-linear pedagogy leads to increased motor creativity and creative thinking in children.
  • Memory inhibition affects children's motor learning, and children with high memory inhibition are more successful in learning motor tasks.
  •  Cognitive thinking and motor creativity in children with high memory inhibition are more than in children with low memory inhibition.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: 1. Motor learning
Received: 2022/04/28 | Accepted: 2022/12/24

References
1. Alizadeh, L., Mohammadzadeh, M.H. (2019). "The Role of Manipulating Homework Constraints on Learning Basketball Skills and Strategies Using Nonlinear Pedagogy". Motor Behavior, 11(38):115-28. Beilock, S.L., Thomas, H., CM., Janet L.S. (2002). "When Paying Attention Becomes Counterproductive: Impact of Divided versus Skill-Focused Attention on Novice and Experienced Performance of Sensorimotor Skills." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.1.6 [DOI:10.22089/mbj.2018.4684.1547]
2. Blomqvist, M., Pekka, L., Lauri, L. (2000). "Expert Novice Differences in Game Performance and Game Understanding of Youth Badminton Players". European Journal of Physical Education, 5(2):208-19. [DOI:10.1080/1740898000050207]
3. Bournelli, P., Anastasia M., Kostas My.(2009). "Motor Creativity and Self-Concept". Creativity Research Journal, 21(1):104-10. [DOI:10.1080/10400410802633657]
4. Chow, J. Y., K. Davids, C. Button, R. Shuttleworth, and I. Renshaw. 2007. "Ara Jo, D. (2007). The Role of Nonlinear Pedagogy in Physical Education." Rev. Educ. Res, 77:251-78. [DOI:10.3102/003465430305615]
5. Crotti, M., James, R., Rudd, SR., Lynne, M., Boddy, K., Fitton, D., Laura, OC., Till U., Lawrence F. (2021). "Effect of Linear and Nonlinear Pedagogy Physical Education Interventions on Childrens Physical Activity: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (SAMPLE-PE)". Children, 8(1):49. [DOI:10.3390/children8010049]
6. Davids, K. (2012). "Learning Design for Nonlinear Dynamical Movement Systems." The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5(1):9-16. [DOI:10.2174/1875399X01205010009]
7. Dietrich, A. (2004). "The Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(6):1011-26. [DOI:10.3758/BF03196731]
8. De Dreu, C.K., Bernard, A.N., Matthijs, B., Inge W., Marieke, R. 2012. "Working Memory Benefits Creative Insight, Musical Improvisation, and Original Ideation through Maintained Task-Focused Attention". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5):656-69. [DOI:10.1177/0146167211435795]
9. Feist, G.J., Michael, E.G.(1998). "The Psychology of Science: Review and Integration of a Nascent Discipline." Review of General Psychology, 2(1):3-47. [DOI:10.1037/1089-2680.2.1.3]
10. Friedman, RS., Ayelet, F., Jens, F., Lioba, W. (2003)."Attentional Priming Effects on Creativity." Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3):277-86. [DOI:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651420]
11. Furley, P., Daniel M. (2015). "Creativity and Working Memory Capacity in Sports: Working Memory Capacity Is Not a Limiting Factor in Creative Decision Making amongst Skilled Performers". Frontiers in Psychology, 6:115. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00115]
12. Handford, C., Keith, D., Simon, B., Chris, B. (1997). "Skill Acquisition in Sport: Some Applications of an Evolving Practice Ecology." Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(6):621-40. [DOI:10.1080/026404197367056]
13. Harrison, JM., Lisa, A., Preece, C.L., Blakemore, R.P., Richards, C.W., Gilbert ,W.F. (1999). "Effects of Two Instructional Modelsskill Teaching and Mastery Learningon Skill Development, Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Game Play in Volleyball". Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19(1):34-57. [DOI:10.1123/jtpe.19.1.34]
14. Machado, J.C., Chellsea, A., Carlos, P., Joo Otaclio, L.S., Daniel, B., Alcides Jos, S.( 2016). "The Influence of Rules Manipulation on Offensive Patterns during Small-Sided and Conditioned Games in Football". Motriz: Revista de Educao Fsica, 22:290-98. [DOI:10.1590/s1980-6574201600040012]
15. Memmert, D., Klaus, R. (2007). "The Effects of Non-Specific and Specific Concepts on Tactical Creativity in Team Ball Sports". Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(12):1423-32. [DOI:10.1080/02640410601129755]
16. Metzler, M. (2017). Instructional Models in Physical Education. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315213521]
17. Mohammadi, L., Hejazi Deanan, P., Shamsipour Dehkordi, P. 2019(). The Role of the Developmental Environment (Home, Kindergarten, and Nursery) on the Intelligence Quotient and Social Skills of Children. J Child Ment Health, 6 (3) :126-137. [DOI:10.29252/jcmh.6.3.12]
18. Moorman, C., Anne, S.M. (1997). "The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity". Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1):91-106. [DOI:10.1177/002224379703400108]
19. Moraru, A., Memmert, D., Van der Kamp, J. (2016). Motor creativity: the roles of attention breadth and working memory in a divergent doing task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(7): 1-12. [DOI:10.1080/20445911.2016.1201084]
20. Mousavi, S.K., Yaali, A. (2020). "The Effect of Non-Linear Training on Badminton Service Performance". Motor Behavior, 9(18):1-16. [DOI:10.29252/JRSM.9.18.1]
21. Nathan, S., Salimin, N., Shahril, M.I. (2017). "A Comparative Analysis of Badminton Game Instructions Effect of Non-Linear Pedagogy and Linear Pedagogy". Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences , 9(6S):1258-85. [DOI:10.4314/jfas.v9i6s.94]
22. Nijstad, B.A., Carsten, K. W., De Dreu, E., Rietzschel, F., Matthijs, B. (2010). "The Dual Pathway to Creativity Model: Creative Ideation as a Function of Flexibility and Persistence". European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1):34-77. [DOI:10.1080/10463281003765323]
23. Pogana, B., and M. Costas. (2008). "The Development of Motor Creativity in Elementary School Children and Its Retension". Creativity Research Journal, 20:1-9. [DOI:10.1080/10400410701842078]
24. Prxedes, A., Fernando, D.V., David, P., Alberto, M. (2018). "The Impact of Nonlinear Pedagogy on Decision-Making and Execution in Youth Soccer Players According to Game Actions". Journal of Human Kinetics, 62(1):185-98. [DOI:10.1515/hukin-2017-0169]
25. Rajabi, G., Najarian, B., Attari, Y.A. (1999). Standardization of the Goodenough - Harris Draw- a Woman Test on 6-11 Years Old Children in Bushehr Iran. Journal of Educational Sciences, 6 (1): 71-92.
26. Renshaw, I., Jia-Yi, C. (2019). "A Constraint-Led Approach to Sport and Physical Education Pedagogy". Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2):103-16. [DOI:10.1080/17408989.2018.1552676]
27. Renshaw, I., Darren, H. (2010). "The Nurdle to Leg and Other Ways of Winning Cricket Matches". Motor Learning in Practice: A Constraints-Led Approach,21: 109-99.
28. Ritter, S.M., Nel, M. (2017). "Enhancement of Cognitive thinking Skills Using a Cognitive-Based Creativity Training". Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1(3):243-53. [DOI:10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3]
29. Richard, V., Lebeau, J. C., Becker, F., Boiangin, N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). Developing cognitive and motor creativity in children through an exercise program using nonlinear pedagogy principles. Creativity Research Journal, 30(4), 391-401.
30. Runco Mark, A., Ivonne, C. (1995). "Cognition and Creativity". Educational Psychology Review, 7(3):243-67. [DOI:10.1007/BF02213373]
31. Russ, Sandra W., and Jessica A. Dillon. (2011). "Changes in Children's Pretend Play over Two Decades". Creativity Research Journal, 23(4):330-38. [DOI:10.1080/10400419.2011.621824]
32. Schmidt, R.A. 1975. "A Schema Theory of Discrete Motor Skill Learning". Psychological Review, 82(4):225. [DOI:10.1037/h0076770]
33. Scibinetti, P., Nicoletta T., Caterina, P. (2011). "Motor Creativity and Cognitive thinking in Children: The Diverging Role of Inhibition". Creativity Research Journal, 23(3):262-72. [DOI:10.1080/10400419.2011.595993]
34. Spencer, J.P. (2020). "The Development of Working Memory". Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(6):545-53. [DOI:10.1177/0963721420959835]
35. Torrents, C., Nat, B., Ngel, R., Robert, H. (2021). "The Motor Creativity Paradox: Constraining to Release Degrees of Freedom". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(2):340. [DOI:10.1037/aca0000291]
36. Towse, J.N., Amy, M. (1999). "An Exploration of Random Generation among Children". British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(3):363-80. [DOI:10.1348/026151099165348]
37. Turner, A.P., Thomas, J.M. (1999). "An Investigation into Teaching Games for Understanding: Effects on Skill, Knowledge, and Game Play". Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(3):286-96. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608047]
38. Vass, E. (2007). "Exploring Processes of Collaborative CreativityThe Role of Emotions in Children's Joint Creative Writing". Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2):107-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2007.06.001]
39. Warren, W.H. (2006). "The Dynamics of Perception and Action". Psychological Review, 113(2):358. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358]
40. Zetou, E., Nikolaos, V., Vassiliki, D., Evangelos, B., Filippos, F. (2014). "The Effect of Game for Understanding on Backhand Tennis Skill Learning and Self-Efficacy Improvement in Elementary Students". Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152:765-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.318]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

© 2024 CC BY 4.0 | International Journal of Motor Control and Learning

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb