Thu, Dec 12, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 3, Issue 3 (8-2021)
IJMCL 2021, 3(3): 11-21 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Siavashi E, Heyrani A, Zarian E. (2021). The Impact of Skill Level Matching in Cooperative Dyadic Interaction on Learning Table Tennis Forehand Skills among Adolescent Girls. IJMCL. 3(3), 11-21. doi:10.52547/ijmcl.3.3.11
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-105-en.html
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-105-en.html
Associate Professor of Motor Behavior, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran , ali.heyrani@gmail.com
Abstract: (2263 Views)
Background: Dyad training is one of the new practicing methods which has received growing attention due to its increasing practice efficiency in skills.
Objective: The present study aims to investigate the impact of skill level matching in cooperative dyadic interaction on learning forehand table tennis skills in adolescent girls.
Methods: Participants were selected based on convenience sampling from among 24 junior high school girls in Nahavand city, and were randomly divided into two groups of Novice-Novice and Novice-Expert. Both groups performed six sessions of participatory dyad training with their respective arrangement (novice- novice, novice- expert), each session consisting of 20 sets of 3-minute with a 1-minute rest time between the sets. Using table tennis forehand shot accuracy test, the motor performance was measured in the pre-test, post-test, retention and transfer stages (merely forehand performance with increasing throwing speed of ball launcher machine).
Results: The results revealed that both Novice-Novice and Novice-Expert groups displayed significant progress learning of table tennis forehand skills. Moreover, the Novice-Expert performed better in the post-test, retention and transfer stages in comparison to the Novice-Novice group.
Conclusions: As a result, Novice-Expert arrangement facilitates learning table tennis forehand skill more than Novice-Novice arrangement during participatory dyad training.
Objective: The present study aims to investigate the impact of skill level matching in cooperative dyadic interaction on learning forehand table tennis skills in adolescent girls.
Methods: Participants were selected based on convenience sampling from among 24 junior high school girls in Nahavand city, and were randomly divided into two groups of Novice-Novice and Novice-Expert. Both groups performed six sessions of participatory dyad training with their respective arrangement (novice- novice, novice- expert), each session consisting of 20 sets of 3-minute with a 1-minute rest time between the sets. Using table tennis forehand shot accuracy test, the motor performance was measured in the pre-test, post-test, retention and transfer stages (merely forehand performance with increasing throwing speed of ball launcher machine).
Results: The results revealed that both Novice-Novice and Novice-Expert groups displayed significant progress learning of table tennis forehand skills. Moreover, the Novice-Expert performed better in the post-test, retention and transfer stages in comparison to the Novice-Novice group.
Conclusions: As a result, Novice-Expert arrangement facilitates learning table tennis forehand skill more than Novice-Novice arrangement during participatory dyad training.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
1. Motor learning
Received: 2021/04/11 | Accepted: 2021/06/15
Received: 2021/04/11 | Accepted: 2021/06/15
References
1. Shea CH, Wulf G, Whltacre C. Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. J Mot Behav. 1999 Jun 1;31(2):119-25. [DOI:10.1080/00222899909600983]
2. Shebilske, W. L., & Regian, J. W. (1992, October). Video games, training, and investigating complex skills. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 36, No. 17, pp. 1296-1300). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications [DOI:10.1518/107118192786749405]
3. Arthur Jr W, Day EA, Bennett Jr W, McNelly TL, Jordan JA. Dyadic versus individual training protocols: Loss and reacquisition of a complex skill. J Appl Psychol. 1997 Oct;82(5):783.. [DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.783]
4. Reed MS, Fraser ED, Dougill AJ. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecol Econ. 2006 Oct 15;59(4):406-18. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.008]
5. Feth D, Groten R, Peer A, Buss M. Control-theoretic model of haptic human-human interaction in a pursuit tracking task. InRO-MAN 2009-The 18th ROMAN .2009 Sep (pp. 1106-1111). IEEE. [DOI:10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326316]
6. Wulf G, Clauss A, Shea CH, Whitacre CA. Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001 Sep 1;72(3):299-303. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2001.10608964]
7. Tolsgaard MG, Madsen ME, Ringsted C, Oxlund BS, Oldenburg A, Sorensen JL, Ottesen B, Tabor A. The effect of dyad versus individual simulation‐based ultrasound training on skills transfer. Med Educ. 2015 Mar;49(3):286-95. [DOI:10.1111/medu.12624]
8. Granados C. The Effects of observation, dialogue, and attentional focus in dyadic training protocol. San Francisco State University. 2010
9. Ko YG, Hall KG. The Effect of Randomizing the Order of Practice Trials in the Dyad Practice of a Golf Putting. Int. J. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2017 Jun;11(1):75-85. [DOI:10.23949/ijhms.2017.06.11.1.5]
10. Darnis F, Lafont L. Cooperative learning and dyadic interactions: two modes of knowledge construction in socio-constructivist settings for team-sport teaching. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy . 2015 Sep 3;20(5):459-73. [DOI:10.1080/17408989.2013.803528]
11. Karlinsky A, Hodges NJ. Turn-taking and concurrent dyad practice aid efficiency but not effectiveness of motor learning in a balance-related task. J Mot Learn Dev . 2018 Jun 1;6(1):35-52. [DOI:10.1123/jmld.2017-0029]
12. Siavashi, E., Zareian, E., Daneshfar, A. The Effect of Exercise Positional Arrangement (Individual, Dyad, Group) on Acquisition and Retention of Rope-Jumping Skills in School Children. Motor Behavior, 2017; 9(27): 153-166 (in Persian).
13. Parvinpour, S., Balali, M., Karimi, S. The Mediator Role of Self-Efficacy in Learning Advantages Related to Dyad and Individual Training. Sport Psychology Studies, 2017; 6(22): 131-144. (in Persian).
14. Crook AE. Training in dyads: Cost-effective or costly for later performance? Master dissertation of Rice University. 2008.
15. Räder SB, Henriksen AH, Butrymovich V, Sander M, Jørgensen E, Lönn L, Ringsted CV. A study of the effect of dyad practice versus that of individual practice on simulation-based complex skills learning and of students' perceptions of how and why dyad practice contributes to learning. Acad Med. 2014 Sep 1;89(9):1287-94. [DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000373]
16. Den Hartigh RJ, Marmelat V, Cox RF. Multiscale coordination between athletes: Complexity matching in ergometer rowing. Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Feb 1;57:434-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.006]
17. Lamotte G, Shah RC, Lazarov O, Corcos DM. Exercise training for persons with Alzheimer's disease and caregivers: a review of dyadic exercise interventions. J Mot Behav. 2017 Jul 4;49(4):365-77. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.2016.1241739]
18. Wulf G, Shea CH. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):185-211. [DOI:10.3758/BF03196276]
19. Whiten A, Horner V, Litchfield CA, Marshall-Pescini S. How do apes ape? Anim Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):36-52. [DOI:10.3758/BF03196005]
20. Hoppitt W, Laland KN. Social learning: an introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton University Press; 2013 Jul 21. [DOI:10.1515/9781400846504]
21. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company; 1989.
22. Deutsch M. A theory of co-operation and competition. Hum Relat. 1949 Apr;2(2):129-52. [DOI:10.1177/001872674900200204]
23. Sebanz N, Knoblich G. Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):353-67. [DOI:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x]
24. Urgesi C, Maieron M, Avenanti A, Tidoni E, Fabbro F, Aglioti SM. Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Nov 1;20(11):2511-21. [DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhp292]
25. Sacheli LM, Aglioti SM, Candidi M. Social cues to joint actions: the role of shared goals. Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 30; 6:1034. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01034]
26. Forbes PA, Hamilton AF. Moving higher and higher: imitators' movements are sensitive to observed trajectories regardless of action rationality. Exp Brain Res. 2017 Sep;235(9):2741-53. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-017-5006-4]
27. Moreau Q, Galvan L, Nazir TA, Paulignan Y. Dynamics of social interaction: kinematic analysis of a joint action. Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 27;7. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02016]
28. Pollock BJ, Lee TD. Effects of the model's skill level on observational motor learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992 Mar 1;63(1):25-9. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1992.10607553]
29. McCullagh P, Caird JK. Correct and learning-models and the use of model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 1990 Jan 1;18(3):107-16.
30. Míreles EJ, De Santis D, Morasso P, Zenzeri J. Transferring knowledge during dyadic interaction: the role of the expert in the learning process. In2016 38th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc .(EMBC) 2016 Aug 16 (pp. 2149-2152). IEEE. [DOI:10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591154]
31. Mireles EJ, Zenzeri J, Squeri V, Morasso P, De Santis D. Skill learning and skill transfer mediated by cooperative haptic interaction. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng . 2017 May 8;25(7):832-43. [DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2700839]
32. Panzer S, Haab T, Massing M, Pfeifer C, Shea CH. Dyad training protocols and the development of a motor sequence representation. Acta Psychol . 2019 Oct 1; 201:102947. [DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102947]
33. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik HN. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human kinetics; 2018 Oct 30.
34. Liao CM, Masters RS. Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. J Sports Sci. 2001 Jan 1;19(5):307-19. [DOI:10.1080/02640410152006081]
35. Ste-Marie DM, Law B, Rymal AM, Jenny O, Hall C, McCullagh P. Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance: an applied model for the use of observation. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012 Sep 1;5(2):145-76. [DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2012.665076]
36. Granados C, Wulf G. Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007 Jun 1;78(3):197-203. [DOI:10.5641/193250307X13082490460940]
37. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology, 7E. Human Kinetics; 2018 Nov 16.
38. Kager S, Hussain A, Cherpin A, Melendez-Calderon A, Takagi A, Endo S, Burdet E, Hirche S, Ang MH, Campolo D. The effect of skill level matching in dyadic interaction on learning of a tracing task. In2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) 2019 Jun 24 (pp. 824-829). IEEE. [DOI:10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779485]
39. Rohbanfard H, Proteau L. Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning. Exp Brain Res . 2011 Dec 1;215(3-4):183-97. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-011-2882-x]
40. Ste-Marie DM, Lelievre N, St. Germain L. Revisiting the Applied Model for the Use of Observation: A Review of Articles Spanning 2011-2018. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020 Oct 1;91(4):594-617. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2019.1693489]
41. Lelievre N, Germain LS, Ste-Marie DM. Varied speeds of video demonstration do not influence the learning of a dance skill. Hum Mov Sci. 2021 Feb 1;75:102749. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2020.102749]
42. Smith R, Lane RD. Unconscious emotion: A cognitive neuroscientific perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2016 Oct 1;69:216-38. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.013]
43. Pinder RA, Davids K, Renshaw I, Araújo D. Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2011 Feb 1;33(1):146-55. [DOI:10.1123/jsep.33.1.146]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
Publisher
- Iranian Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology Association (IMBSPA)
