Wed, May 1, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 3, Issue 1 (2-2021)
IJMCL 2021, 3(1): 47-56 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khalaji H, Moradi J, Akbari Dastjerdi F. (2021). The Effect of Self-Modeling with Mobile Phone on Overarm Throwing Skill in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. IJMCL. 3(1), 47-56. doi:10.52547/ijmcl.3.1.47
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-89-en.html
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-89-en.html
Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Arak University, Arak, Iran , h-khalaji@araku.ac.ir
Abstract: (2347 Views)
Background: One of the most important disorders in children is developmental coordination disorder. In this disorder, motor problems affect children's daily activities, academic achievement, and health in the absence of any known medical condition or neurological disorder.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of self-modeling with mobile phone on overarm throwing skill in 7-9 years old children with developmental coordination disorder.
Method: Twenty-four children with DCD were selected as purposeful sample and randomly divided into two experimental and one control group. Experimental groups conducted self-modeling with mobile phone under the supervision of a trainer and their parents. The control group trained overarm throwing skill without self-modeling. Training protocol consisted of 5 weeks, three sessions per week and each session included 40 minutes. The process and the product of overarm throwing were measured by the Ulrich test of gross motor development, the second edition, and the accuracy of the throw test.
Results: Covariance test and Bonferroni’s post hoc test showed that there was a significant improvement in the process of overarm throwing skill in the two experimental groups (P<0.05). Comparison of the groups showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in the throwing process (P>0.05), but both groups had a significant difference with the control group (P<0.05). Comparison of the groups in the product of the throwing skill showed that there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: In general, the results of this study showed that that self-modeling with mobile phone improves the process of overarm throwing skill in children with developmental coordination disorders. Self-modeling probably facilitates the process of performing and learning skill in these children by creating a representation of the task.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of self-modeling with mobile phone on overarm throwing skill in 7-9 years old children with developmental coordination disorder.
Method: Twenty-four children with DCD were selected as purposeful sample and randomly divided into two experimental and one control group. Experimental groups conducted self-modeling with mobile phone under the supervision of a trainer and their parents. The control group trained overarm throwing skill without self-modeling. Training protocol consisted of 5 weeks, three sessions per week and each session included 40 minutes. The process and the product of overarm throwing were measured by the Ulrich test of gross motor development, the second edition, and the accuracy of the throw test.
Results: Covariance test and Bonferroni’s post hoc test showed that there was a significant improvement in the process of overarm throwing skill in the two experimental groups (P<0.05). Comparison of the groups showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in the throwing process (P>0.05), but both groups had a significant difference with the control group (P<0.05). Comparison of the groups in the product of the throwing skill showed that there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: In general, the results of this study showed that that self-modeling with mobile phone improves the process of overarm throwing skill in children with developmental coordination disorders. Self-modeling probably facilitates the process of performing and learning skill in these children by creating a representation of the task.
Keywords: Self-modeling, Mobile Phone, Overarm Throwing Skill, Developmental Coordination Disorder, Parents
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
1-1. Motor Development
Received: 2020/10/9 | Accepted: 2021/01/29
Received: 2020/10/9 | Accepted: 2021/01/29
References
1. Adams, I. L., Lust, J. M., Wilson, P. H., & Steenbergen, B. (2014). Compromised motor control in children with DCD: A deficit in the internal model?-A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 225-244. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.08.011] [PMID]
2. Allahyari, A., Heidari, S., & Jian, F. (2015). Attachment styles, addiction to the mobile phone and how to use it in students. Psychological Methods and Models, 6(21), 104-87.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC, USA: American Psychiatric Association. [DOI:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
4. Ávila, L. T., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 849-853. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.001]
5. Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. Handbook of socialization theory and research, 213, 262.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Bellini, S., & Akullian, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional children, 73(3), 264-287. [DOI:10.1177/001440290707300301]
8. Black, C. B. (2004). The effect of task structure, practice schedule, and model type on the learning of relative and absolute timing by physical and observational practice (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University).
9. Cannella-Malone, H., Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M., de la Cruz, B., Edrisinha, C., & Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Comparing video prompting to video modeling for teaching daily living skills to six adults with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 344-356.
10. Darrah, J., Law, M., & Pollock, N. (2001). Family-centered functional therapy-a choice for children with motor dysfunction. Infants & Young Children, 13(4), 79-87. [DOI:10.1097/00001163-200113040-00014]
11. Edwards, J., Jeffrey, S., May, T., Rinehart, N. J., & Barnett, L. M. (2017). Does playing a sports active video game improve object control skills of children with autism spectrum disorder?. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 6(1), 17-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2016.09.004] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun, J. C., & Goodway, J. (2006). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (pp. 248-270). Boston, MA: Mcgraw-hill.
13. Golenia, L., Bongers, R. M., van Hoorn, J. F., Otten, E., Mouton, L. J., & Schoemaker, M. M. (2018). Variability in coordination patterns in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Human movement science, 60, 202-213. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2018.06.009] [PMID]
14. Haywood, K. M., & Getchell, N. (2019). Life span motor development. Human kinetics.
15. Hosford, R. E. (1981). Self-as-a-model: A cognitive social learning technique. The Counseling Psychologist, 9(1), 45-62. [DOI:10.1177/001100008000900113]
16. Jennings, C. T., Reaburn, P., & Rynne, S. B. (2013). The effect of a self-modelling video intervention on motor skill acquisition and retention of a novice track cyclist's standing start performance. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 8(3), 467-480. [DOI:10.1260/1747-9541.8.3.467]
17. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., Sanders, G. J., Rebold, M., & Gates, P. (2013). The relationship between cell phone use, physical and sedentary activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in a sample of US college students. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10(1), 79. [DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-10-79] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Mahoney, G., & Perales, F. (2006). The role of parents in early motor intervention. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 10(2), 67-73. [DOI:10.3104/reviews.307] [PMID]
19. McCoy, K., & Hermansen, E. (2007). Video modeling for individuals with autism: A review of model types and effects. Education and treatment of children, 183-213. [DOI:10.1353/etc.2007.0029]
20. Payne, V. G., & Isaacs, L. D. (2017). Human motor development: A lifespan approach. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315213040]
21. Roche, R., Viswanathan, P., Clark, J. E., & Whitall, J. (2016). Children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) can adapt to perceptible and subliminal rhythm changes but are more variable. Human movement science, 50, 19-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2016.09.003] [PMID]
22. Salehi, H., Afsorde Bakhshayesh, R., Movahedi, A. R., & Ghasemi, V. (2012). Psychometric properties of a Persian version of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire in boys aged 6-11 year-old. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 1(4), 135-161.
23. Salehi, H., Zarezade, M. (2016). Prevalence Distribution of Fundamental Movement Skills in Children of Tehran Elementary Schools. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement, 8(2), 281-299. doi: 10.22059/jmlm.2016.59909
24. Sayers, L. K., Cowden, J. E., & Sherrill, C. (2002). Parents' perceptions of motor interventions for infants and toddlers with Down syndrome. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19(2), 199-219. [DOI:10.1123/apaq.19.2.199] [PMID]
25. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Human kinetics.
26. Schoemaker, M. M., Flapper, B. C., Reinders-Messelink, H. A., & de Kloet, A. (2008). Validity of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for developmental coordination disorder. Human Movement Science, 27(2), 190-199. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.003] [PMID]
27. Sternad, D. (2018). It's not (only) the mean that matters: variability, noise and exploration in skill learning. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 20, 183-195. [DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.004] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Ulrich DA. (2000). Test of Gross Motor Development .Examiners Manual (2nd Ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
29. Van Laarhoven, T., Zurita, L. M., Johnson, J. W., Grider, K. M., & Grider, K. L. (2009). Comparison of self, other, and subjective video models for teaching daily living skills to individuals with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 509-522.
30. Wilson, B. N., Kaplan, B. J., Crawford, S. G., Campbell, A., & Dewey, D. (2000). Reliability and validity of a parent questionnaire on childhood motor skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(5), 484-493. [DOI:10.5014/ajot.54.5.484] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
Publisher
- Iranian Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology Association (IMBSPA)
