Volume 1, Issue 2 (11-2019)                   IJMCL 2019, 1(2): 41-45 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nazemzadegan G H, Yousefi M. The Effect of Explicit and Implicit Learning on Static Balance. IJMCL. 2019; 1 (2) :41-45
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-43-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Department of Sport Sciences, Shiraz University
Abstract:   (1613 Views)
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of learning type on balance.
Methods: For this purpose, 80 female students aged 9-12 years who were selected by random cluster sampling and after Flamingo test, they were divided into two groups randomly: explicit learning and implicit learning. The subjects were required to maintain balance on the Stabilometer. The acquisition stage included 24 attempts 60 seconds. Explicit learning groups received feedback while on the device, but the implicit learning group was required to perform a secondary cognitive task in addition to maintaining a balance without receiving feedback.
Results: Analysis of covariance with a significant level of р≤ 0.05 showed that there was no significant difference between explicit and implicit learning in static balance.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the subjects of both groups had improvement in their post-test balance records compared to the pre-test. Therefore, probably the static balance with regard to its subcortical mechanism cannot be influenced by the type of learning.
Full-Text [PDF 268 kb]   (537 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: 2. Motor control
Received: 2019/09/3 | Accepted: 2019/10/4 | Published: 2019/11/29

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Motor Control and Learning

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb