Thu, Apr 25, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 2, Issue 1 (2-2020)
IJMCL 2020, 2(1): 26-37 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Yavari N, Shojaei M, Daneshfar A. (2020). The Effect of Video Feedback of Social Comparison on Activity of Mirror Neurons and Golf putt Learning in Young Girls. IJMCL. 2(1), 26-37. doi:10.29252/ijmcl.2.1.17
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-30-en.html
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-30-en.html
Master Degree in Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran , n.yavari67@yahoo.com
Abstract: (4387 Views)
Background: Social comparison feedback and activity of mirror neurons are both associated with stimulating an individual's emotions, and as each of them suggests a different type of stimulation of emotion to improve performance.
Objective: The research aimed to investigate the effect of comparative-social video feedback on the activity of mirror neurons in the brain.
Methods: There were randomly selected 18 non-athlete females from Al-Zahra University and they were randomly classified in positive, negative and real groups. On the first day, there was taught how to pay pat golf and a 6-stroke impact test (pretest); the second day consisted of 60 beats with five minutes break between the attempts and receiving video feedback tailored to the group after each attempt (acquisition session); and on the third day, there were performed six attempts (retention test). Using EEG sensors, there was the recorded activity of brain mirror neurons in three conditions: basic, execution and observation. There was also recorded data of accuracy of kicks.
Results: The results of combined variance analysis did not show the effect of social comparison feedback on learning accuracy; however, in registering brain activity, there was a significant difference between the activity of mirror neurons in execution and observation conditions. There was no significant difference between the three groups in the amount of electrical activity in the brain during execution and observation.
Conclusion: This feedback seems to have little effect on the activity of mirror neurons.
Objective: The research aimed to investigate the effect of comparative-social video feedback on the activity of mirror neurons in the brain.
Methods: There were randomly selected 18 non-athlete females from Al-Zahra University and they were randomly classified in positive, negative and real groups. On the first day, there was taught how to pay pat golf and a 6-stroke impact test (pretest); the second day consisted of 60 beats with five minutes break between the attempts and receiving video feedback tailored to the group after each attempt (acquisition session); and on the third day, there were performed six attempts (retention test). Using EEG sensors, there was the recorded activity of brain mirror neurons in three conditions: basic, execution and observation. There was also recorded data of accuracy of kicks.
Results: The results of combined variance analysis did not show the effect of social comparison feedback on learning accuracy; however, in registering brain activity, there was a significant difference between the activity of mirror neurons in execution and observation conditions. There was no significant difference between the three groups in the amount of electrical activity in the brain during execution and observation.
Conclusion: This feedback seems to have little effect on the activity of mirror neurons.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
1. Motor learning
Received: 2019/11/9 | Accepted: 2020/01/15
Received: 2019/11/9 | Accepted: 2020/01/15
References
1. Aglioti, S.M., Cesari, P., Romani, M, & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience. 11: 1109-16. [DOI:10.1038/nn.2182]
2. Annett, M. (1970). The classification of hand preference by association analysis. The British Journal of Psychology. 61 (3): 303-321. [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01248.x]
3. Badami, R., Vaezmousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizade, M. (2012). Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on self-confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 83, (2): 1-8. [DOI:10.5641/027013612800745275]
4. Coren, S. (1993). The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 31 (1): 1-3. [DOI:10.3758/BF03334122]
5. Cross, E.S., Hamilton, A.F., & Grafton, S.T. (2006). Building a motor situation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuro image, 31, 1257-1267. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.033]
6. Elias, L.J., Bryden, M.P., & Butman-Fieming, M.B. (1998). Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuroasychologia, 36 (1), 37-43. [DOI:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00107-3]
7. Enticott, P.G., Harrison, B.A., Arnold, S.L., Nibaldi, K., Segrave, R.A., Fitzgibbon, B.M., Kennedy, H.A., Lau, K., & Fitzgerald, P.B. (2012). Emotional valence modulates putative mirror neuron activity. Neuroscience Letters. 508: 56-59. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.12.018]
8. Hajcak, G., Molnar, C., George, M.S., Bolger, K., Koola, J., & Nahas, Z. (2007). Emotion facilitates action: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of motor cortex excitability during picture viewing. Psychophysiology. 44: 91-97. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00487.x]
9. Hill, A.T., Fitzgibbona, B.M., Arnolda, S.L., Rinehart, N.J., Fitzgeralda, P.B., & Enticotta, P.G. (2013). Modulation of putative mirror neuron activity by both positively and negatively valenced affective stimuli: A TMS study. Behavioral Brain Research. 249: 116-123. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.027]
10. Hutchinson, J.C., Sherman, T., & Martinovic, N. (2008). The effect of manipulated self-efficacy on perceived and sustained effort. Applied Sport Psychology. 20: 457-472. [DOI:10.1080/10413200802351151]
11. Kim, Y.T., Seo, J.H., Song, H.J., Yoo, D.S., Lee, H.J., Lee, J., Kwon, E., Kim, J.G., & Chang, Y. (2011). "Neural correlates related to action observation in expert archers". Behavioural Brain Research, 223,342-347. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.053]
12. Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). "Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning". The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4)738-749. [DOI:10.1080/17470210903111839]
13. Lucana, T.G., Chiviacowsky, S.A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). "Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children". Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 849-853. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.001]
14. Magil, R. A. (2011). Motor learning and control (9th Ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
15. Panahi Borujeni, E. (2012). The effect of feedback on successful, normative and self-control efforts on motivation, execution and learning of badminton service skills in 10-12 years old girls. Master's Thesis. AlZahra University.
16. Prinz, W. (1997). "Perception and action planning". European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9,129-154. [DOI:10.1080/713752551]
17. Rashidi, F. (2013). The effect of normative feedback on accuracy of performance, electromyography and kinematics of dart throw. Master's Thesis. AlZahra University.
18. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M.A. (1998). "language within our grasp". Trends in neurosciences, 21,188-194. [DOI:10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0]
19. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). "The mirror-neuron system". Annual Review of Neuroscience.27, 169-192. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230]
20. Rodriguez, A.L., Alonso, V.L., & del-Olmo, M. F. (2013). Mirror neuron system and observational learning: Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence. Behavioural Brain Research, 248, 104-113. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.03.033]
21. Stoate, I., Wulf, G. &,Lewthwaite, R. (2012). "Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners". Journal of Sport Sciences, 1-9. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2012.671533]
22. Vogt, S., Buccino, G., Wohlschlaeger, A.M., Canessa, N., Shah, N.J., Zilles, K., Eickhoff, S.B., Freund, H.J., Rizzolatti, G., & Fink, G.R. (2007). "Prefrontal involvement in imitation learning of hand actions: effects of practice and expertise". Neuroimage, 37, 1371-1383. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.005]
23. Wulf, G., Chivacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). "Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task". Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(4), 425-431. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2010.10599703]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
Publisher
- Iranian Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology Association (IMBSPA)
