Sat, Apr 20, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 4, Issue 3 (8-2022)
IJMCL 2022, 4(3): 1-4 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Woodard K, Markwell L, Beck A, Porter J. (2022). Heart Rate is Distinctly Influenced by Complexity of Instructions and Direction of Attentional Focus. IJMCL. 4(3), 1-4. doi:10.52547/ijmcl.4.3.1
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-117-en.html
URL: http://ijmcl.com/article-1-117-en.html
Heart Rate is Distinctly Influenced by Complexity of Instructions and Direction of Attentional Focus
Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA , lmarkwel@vols.utk.edu
Abstract: (1995 Views)
Background: Contemporary theories propose that adopting an external focus of attention allows the body’s system to self-organize, resulting in more efficient and automated control of motor behavior. In that context, our purpose in this study was to measure heart rate to test whether altering focus of attention would elicit a physiologic response during a static balancing task.
Method: Twenty-three college aged participants (M = 23.3 ± 5.63 years) balanced on an AccuSway Balance Platform while performing a secondary supra-postural task. Center of pressure (COP) and heart rate was measured throughout each trial. Participants completed three baseline trials followed by three trials in each of two experimental conditions presented in a counterbalanced order. In the baseline trials, participants were instructed to “maintain your balance to the best of your ability.” Internal focus (IF) instructions were “focus on minimizing movement of your hand, while maintaining your balance to the best of your ability.” External focus (EF) instructions were “focus on minimizing movement of the sheet, while maintaining balance to the best of your ability.”
Results: Results indicated: (a) a significant change in heart rate during trials in all conditions, p < .001, (b) a significantly lower heart rate for trials completed in the baseline condition compared to trials completed under either the IF or EF instructional set, p < .001, and (c) a significantly more rapid lowering in heart rate during trials completed under EF instructions compared to IF instructions, p < .001. There were no significant differences in the COP between any of the conditions (p >0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that the complexity and attentional direction of instructions may differentially influence heart rate responses during motor performance. Further explanations and implications for future research are discussed.
Method: Twenty-three college aged participants (M = 23.3 ± 5.63 years) balanced on an AccuSway Balance Platform while performing a secondary supra-postural task. Center of pressure (COP) and heart rate was measured throughout each trial. Participants completed three baseline trials followed by three trials in each of two experimental conditions presented in a counterbalanced order. In the baseline trials, participants were instructed to “maintain your balance to the best of your ability.” Internal focus (IF) instructions were “focus on minimizing movement of your hand, while maintaining your balance to the best of your ability.” External focus (EF) instructions were “focus on minimizing movement of the sheet, while maintaining balance to the best of your ability.”
Results: Results indicated: (a) a significant change in heart rate during trials in all conditions, p < .001, (b) a significantly lower heart rate for trials completed in the baseline condition compared to trials completed under either the IF or EF instructional set, p < .001, and (c) a significantly more rapid lowering in heart rate during trials completed under EF instructions compared to IF instructions, p < .001. There were no significant differences in the COP between any of the conditions (p >0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that the complexity and attentional direction of instructions may differentially influence heart rate responses during motor performance. Further explanations and implications for future research are discussed.
Full-Text [PDF 265 kb]
(537 Downloads)
- Instructions that differ in complexity and attention direction can distinctly affect heart rate during the performance of a continuous balancing task.
- External focus instructions led to a more rapid decrease in heart rate during task performance compared to internal focus instructions.
- The average heart rate was lowest in the condition with the least complex instructions.
- Practitioners should limit instructional complexity to avoid negative physiological responses.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
1. Motor learning
Received: 2022/04/5 | Accepted: 2022/07/8
Received: 2022/04/5 | Accepted: 2022/07/8
References
1. Allen, R. (1983). Human Stress: Its Nature and Control. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Press.
2. Chua, L., Jimenez-Diaz, J., Lewthwaite, R., Kim, T., & Wulf, G. . (2021). Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 618-645. [DOI:10.1037/bul0000335]
3. Ille, A., Selin, I., Do, M., & Thon, B. . (2013). Attentional focus effects on sprint start performance as a function of skill level. Journal of Sport Science, 31, 1705-1712. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2013.797097]
4. Jorna, P. (1992). Spectral analysis of heart rate and psychological state: A review of its validity as a workload index. Biological Psychology, 34. [DOI:10.1016/0301-0511(92)90017-O]
5. Kuhn, Y. A., Keller, M., Ruffieux, J., & Taube, W. . (2013). Adopting an external focus of attention alters intracortical inhibition within the primary motor cortex. Acta Physiologica 220, 289-299. [DOI:10.1111/apha.12807]
6. Lohse, K. R., Sherwood, D. E., & Healy, A. F. (2011). Neuromuscular effects of shifting the focus of attention in a simple force production task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43, 173-184. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.2011.555436]
7. Mansikka, H., Simola, P., Virtanen, K., Harris, D., & Oksama, L. . (2016a). Fighter pilots' heart rate, heart rate variation and performance during instrument approaches. . Ergonomics, 59, 1344-1352. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2015.1136699]
8. Mansikka, H., Virtanen, R., Harris, D., & Simola, P. (2016b). Fighter pilots' heart rate, heart rate variation, and performance during an instrument flight rules proficiency test. . Applied Ergonomics, 56, 213-219. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.006]
9. McNevin, N. H. W., G. (2002). Attentional focus on supra-postural tasks affects postural control. Psychological Researh, 67, 22-29. [DOI:10.1007/s00426-002-0093-6]
10. Moray, N. (1979). Models and Measures of Mental Workload. In N. Moray (Ed.), Mental Workload. Boston, MA: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4757-0884-4]
11. Mullen, R., Jones, E. S., Faull, A., & Kieran, K. . (2012). Attentional focus and performance anxiety: Effects on simulated race-driving performance and heart rate variability. . Frontiers in Movement Science and Sport Psychology, 3, 1-10. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00426]
12. Neumann, D., & Brown, J. . (2013). The effect of attentional focus strategy on physiological and motor performance during a sit-up exercise. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1, 7-15. [DOI:10.1027/0269-8803/a000081]
13. Neumann, D. L., & Heng, S. . (2011). The effect of associative and dissociative attentional focus strategies on muscle activity and heart rate during a weight training exercise. . Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 1-8. [DOI:10.1027/0269-8803/a000011]
14. Perusse-Lachance, E., Tremblay, A., Chaput, J., Poirier, P., Teasdale, N., Drapeau, V., Senecal, C., & Brassard, P. . (2012). Mental work stimulates cardiovascular responses through a reduction in cardiac parasympathetic modulation in men and women. Bioenergetics, 2, 7-15.
15. Peterson, L., R. & Peterson, M. J. . (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 193-198. [DOI:10.1037/h0049234]
16. Riley, M. A., Stoffregen, T. A., Grocki, M. J., & Turvey, M. T. . (1999). Postural stabilization for the control of touching. Human Movement Science, 18, 795-817. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00041-X]
17. Roscoe, A. H. (1992). Assessing pilot workload. Why measure heart rate, HRV and respiration?. . Biological Psychology, 34, 259-287. [DOI:10.1016/0301-0511(92)90018-P]
18. Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Kaplan, J. . (1999). Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation, 99, 2192-2217. [DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.99.16.2192]
19. Schucker, L., Schmeing, L., & Hagemann, N. . (2016). "Look around while running!" Attentional focus effects in inexperienced runners. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 27, 205-212. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.08.013]
20. Sherwood, D. E., Lohse, K. R., & Healy, A. F. (2020). The effect of an external and internal focus of attention on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 91-104. [DOI:10.1037/xhp0000698]
21. Vance, J., Wulf, G., Tollner, T., McNevin, N., Mercer, J. . (2004). EMG activity as a function of the performer's focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36. [DOI:10.3200/JMBR.36.4.450-459]
22. Wulf, G. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years. International Review in Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8, 77-104. [DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728]
23. Wulf, G., and Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 648-660. [DOI:10.3758/BF03196201]
24. Wulf, G., McNevin, N. H., & Shea, C. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 1143-1154. [DOI:10.1080/713756012]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
Publisher
- Iranian Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology Association (IMBSPA)
