International Journal of Motor Control and Learning
International Journal of Motor Control and Learning
IJMCL
Literature & Humanities
http://ijmcl.com
1
admin
2717-3283
2676-3451
10.61186/ijmcl
33972
en
jalali
1401
11
1
gregorian
2023
2
1
5
1
online
1
fulltext
en
Effects of Linear and Non-linear Pedagogy on Motor and Cognitive Creativity
1.Motor learning
1. Motor learning
مقاله اصیل
Original Article
<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:150%"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span new="" roman="" times=""><span style="color:black"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:150%">Background: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:150%">The aim of this study was to determine the effect of linear and non-linear pedagogy on motor and cognitive creativity with respect to the role of high and low memory inhibition.<br>
<b>Methods:</b> 40 students (Mean 7 ± 0.51 years) were divided into four groups (high inhibition and nonlinear training, low inhibition and nonlinear training, high inhibition and linear training, and low inhibition and linear training). The training sessions included 6 weeks, 3 sessions per week, and 60 minutes for each session. In the pretest, Torrance's cognitive thinking test and Bertsch's motor creativity test were performed on them and fundamental movements were performed in both linear and nonlinear methods. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:150%"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span new="" roman="" times=""><span style="color:black"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:150%">Results:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:150%"> The results of the 2 (type of training) × 2 (memory inhibition) analysis of covariance showed that in all components (fluency, originality, and flexibility) of motor creativity and cognitive thinking, the nonlinear training group performed better than linear training (p≤0.05). In fluency and originality of cognitive thinking, high memory inhibition groups were better than low memory inhibition groups (p≤0.05). In the fluency of cognitive thinking, the nonlinear group had the highest score and the linear group had the lowest score. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:150%"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span new="" roman="" times=""><span style="color:black"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:150%">Conclusion:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:150%"> The results showed that the use of nonlinear training is more effective than linear training in improving motor creativity and cognitive thinking.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<br>
</span>
Fluency, Originality, Flexibility, Memory inhibition
1
9
http://ijmcl.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-214-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1
Mina
Asadi
M.asadi@alzahra.ac.ir
10031947532846002431
10031947532846002431
No
Master of Science, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
Parvaneh
Shamsipour Dehkordi
p.shamsipour@alzahra.ac.ir
10031947532846002432
10031947532846002432
Yes
Associate Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran Iran
Marzieh
Entezari
Mentezari@Kharazmi.ac.ir
10031947532846002433
10031947532846002433
No
c) Ph.D in Motor Learning, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran