Volume 4, Issue 3 (8-2022)                   IJMCL 2022, 4(3): 5-9 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Central Park Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New York, USA , pratistha20122@gmail.com
Abstract:   (2078 Views)

Background:  The transfer of motor skills is one of the central topics in motor behavior and speaks to the effects of learned motor skills on learning or performing other skills.
The purpose of this investigation was to examine the transfer of skillful fine or moderately-fine movements to novel tasks requiring similar movements. 
Methods: The study involved 43 undergraduate university students in three groups: university musicians, athletes, and a control cohort.  Two novel motor tasks were performed that required either fine hand movements (pursuit rotor task), or moderately-fine arm movements (underhand dart throw task).
Results: For the fine motor task, musicians performed better than the athletes and the control (p<0.05), but did not demonstrate less movement asymmetry than the other groups, as hypothesized (p>0.05).  For the moderately-fine task, the athletes performed better than the other two groups (p<0.05), and in particular, with the dominant arm (p<0.05), as hypothesized.
Conclusion: A lack of shared elements between musical instrument playing skills and the novel fine motor task likely contributed to the relatively low levels of performance with the musicians.  Conversely, the presence of more shared elements between sports throwing skills and the novel moderately-fine task likely contributed to greater levels of performance by the athletes.

Full-Text [PDF 286 kb]   (821 Downloads)    
  • The transfer of learning to new skills is a key attribute of the motor system.
  • The commonalities between tasks play an important role in the transfer.
  • Bimanual tasks that share common elements should produce a positive bimanual transfer.
  • Unilateral tasks that share common elements should produce a positive unilateral transfer.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: 2. Motor control
Received: 2022/04/11 | Accepted: 2022/07/18

References
1. Amunts, K., Schlaug, G., Jäncke, L., Steinmetz, H., Schleicher, A., Dabringhaus, A., & Zilles, K. (1997). Motor cortex and hand motor skills: Structural compliance in the human brain. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 206-215, doi.org/ 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:3<206::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-7 [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:33.0.CO;2-7]
2. Cohen, J. (1988). The effect size. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Abingdon: Routledge, 77-83.
3. Dizio, P., & Lackner, J. R. (1995). Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: Endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the non-exposed arm. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1787-1792, doi.org/10.1152/jn.1995.74.4.1787. [DOI:10.1152/jn.1995.74.4.1787]
4. Elliott, D., & Roy, E. A. (1981). Interlimb transfer after adaptation to visual displacement: Patterns predicted from the functional closeness of limb neural control centers. Perception, 10, 383-389, doi.org/ 10.1068/p100383. [DOI:10.1068/p100383]
5. Erdem, K. (2015). The effect of playing different musical instruments on arm asymmetry. Educational Research and Reviews, 10 (20), 2661-2666, doi.org/ 10.5897/ERR2015.2398. [DOI:10.5897/ERR2015.2398]
6. Fischman, M. G., Christina, R. W., & Vercruyssen, M. J. (1981) Retention and transfer of motor skills: A review for the practitioner, Quest, 33 (2), 181-194, doi.org/ 10.1080/00336297.1981.10483753. [DOI:10.1080/00336297.1981.10483753]
7. Franek, M., Mates, J., Radil, T., Beck, K., & Poppel, E. (1991). Finger tapping in musicians and non-musicians. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 3, 277-279, doi.org/ 10.1016/0167-8760(91)90022-P. [DOI:10.1016/0167-8760(91)90022-P]
8. French, K. E., Spurgeon, J. H., & Nevett, M. E. (1995) Expert-novice differences in cognitive and skill execution components of youth baseball performance, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66(3), 194-201, doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1995.10608833. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1995.10608833]
9. Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non- musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23 (27), 9240-9245, doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09240.2003. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09240.2003]
10. Imamizu, H., & Shimojo, S. (1995). The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: Implications from intermanual transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 719-733, doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.21.4.719. [DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.719]
11. Kincaid, A. E., Duncan, S., & Scott, S. A. (2002). Assessment of fine motor skills in musicians and non-musicians: Differences in timing versus sequence accuracy in a bimanual fingering task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 245-257, doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.1.245. [DOI:10.2466/pms.2002.95.1.245]
12. Laszlo, J. I., Baguley, R. A., & Bairstow, P.J. (1970). Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2, 261-271, doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1970.10734884. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.1970.10734884]
13. Latash, M. L. (1999). Mirror writing: Learning, transfer, and implications for internal inverse models. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31, 107-111, doi.org/10.1080/00222899909600981. [DOI:10.1080/00222899909600981]
14. Lee, T. D., & Genovese, E.D. (1989). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Different effects for discrete and continuous tasks, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 59-65, doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607414. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1989.10607414]
15. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492-527, doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492]
16. Mueller, S. T. (2012). The PEBL pursuit rotor task. Computer software retrieved from http://pebl.sourceforge.net
17. Parlow, S. E., & Kinsbourne, M. (1989). Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: Implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain. Brain and Cognition, 11, 98 - 113, doi.org 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90008-0. [DOI:10.1016/0278-2626(89)90008-0]
18. Piper, B. J., Mueller, S. T., Geerken, A. R., Dixon, K. L., Kroliczak, G., Olsen, R. H. J., & Miller, J. K. (2015). Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the Psychology Experimental Building Language test battery in young adults. PeerJ, 1-26, doi.org 10.7717/peerj.1460. [DOI:10.7717/peerj.1460]
19. Radlo, S. J., Steinberg, G. M., Singer, R. N., Barba, D. A., & Melnikov, A. (2002). The influence of an attentional focus strategy on alpha brain wave activity, heart rate, and dart-throwing experience. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33, 205-217.
20. Sainburg, R.L., & Wang, X. (2002). Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: Independence of direction and final position information. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 437-447, doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1140-7. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-002-1140-7]
21. Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Neurophysiological evidence for transfer appropriate processing of memory: Processing versus feature similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 612-619, doi.org/10.3758/BF03196810. [DOI:10.3758/BF03196810]
22. Schlaug, G. (2001). The brain of musicians. A model for structural and functional adaptation. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 930, 281- 299. [DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05739.x]
23. Taylor, H. G., & Heilman, K.M. (1980). Left-hemisphere motor dominance in right handers. Cortex, 16, 587-603, doi.org/ 10.1016/s0010-9452(80)80006-2. [DOI:10.1016/S0010-9452(80)80006-2]
24. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. II. The estimation of magnitudes. Psychological Review, 8(4), 384-395. doi.org/ 10.1037/h0071280. [DOI:10.1037/h0071280]
25. Watson, A. H. D. (2006). What can studying musicians tell us about motor control on the hand? Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 208, 527-542, doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00545. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00545.x]
26. Yanagisawa, O., Futatsubashi, G., & Taniguchi, H. (2018). Side-to-side difference in dynamic unilateral balance ability and pitching performance in Japanese collegiate baseball pitchers. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 30(1), 58-62, doi.org/ 10.1589/jpts.30.58. [DOI:10.1589/jpts.30.58]

Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).